[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3af0795f-2ba8-2033-8b4e-e6fa889767aa@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:54:49 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mprotect: fix obsolete function name in
change_pte_range()
On 23.07.23 05:31, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Since commit 79a1971c5f14 ("mm: move the copy_one_pte() pte_present check
> into the caller"), the explanation of preserving soft-dirtiness is moved
> into copy_nonpresent_pte(). Update corresponding comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/mprotect.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 5c3112d92466..3f36c88a238e 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> } else if (is_writable_device_private_entry(entry)) {
> /*
> * We do not preserve soft-dirtiness. See
> - * copy_one_pte() for explanation.
> + * copy_nonpresent_pte() for explanation.
> */
> entry = make_readable_device_private_entry(
> swp_offset(entry));
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists