linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/aperfmperf: Make stale CPU frequency response within limits.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hqPb1+tzGiOCSKr=4QcjnRKT5Gd8FcNbD_Gz5CnAw8tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:31:29 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, yang.jie@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/aperfmperf: Make stale CPU frequency response within limits.

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 2:14 AM Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net> wrote:
>
> Currently, when the CPU frequency is stale the nominal clock frequency
> is returned by calls to arch_freq_get_on_cpu(). Some users are
> confused by the high reported frequency when their system is idle
> and/or it is above a reduced maximum they set.
>
> This patch will return the policy minimum as the stale frequency reply
> from arch_freq_get_on_cpu().
>
> Reported-by: Yang Jie <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217597
> Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 13 +++++--------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c        | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h          |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> index fdbb5f07448f..44cc96864d94 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
> @@ -418,9 +418,10 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>         unsigned long last;
>         u64 acnt, mcnt;
>
> -       if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
> -               goto fallback;
> -
> +       if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)){
> +               freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
> +               return freq ? freq : cpufreq_quick_get_min(cpu);
> +       }
>         do {
>                 seq = raw_read_seqcount_begin(&s->seq);
>                 last = s->last_update;
> @@ -433,13 +434,9 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>          * which covers idle and NOHZ full CPUs.
>          */
>         if (!mcnt || (jiffies - last) > MAX_SAMPLE_AGE)
> -               goto fallback;
> +               return cpufreq_quick_get_min(cpu);
>
>         return div64_u64((cpu_khz * acnt), mcnt);
> -
> -fallback:
> -       freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
> -       return freq ? freq : cpu_khz;

It looks to me like modifying cpufreq_quick_get) to return policy->min
if policy->cur is 0 would work in a similar way, wouldn't it?

>  }
>
>  static int __init bp_init_aperfmperf(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 50bbc969ffe5..a0b24f61a5b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1796,6 +1796,24 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_max(unsigned int cpu)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_quick_get_max);
>
> +/**
> + * cpufreq_quick_get_min - return the min frequency for a given CPU
> + * @cpu: CPU number
> + */
> +unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_min(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +       struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +       unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
> +
> +       if (policy) {
> +               ret_freq = policy->min;
> +               cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> +       }
> +
> +       return ret_freq;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_quick_get_min);
> +
>  /**
>   * cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq - get the max hardware frequency of the CPU
>   * @cpu: CPU number
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 172ff51c1b2a..c74dcb5f9263 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu);
>  unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned int cpu);
>  unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_max(unsigned int cpu);
> +unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_min(unsigned int cpu);
>  unsigned int cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(unsigned int cpu);
>  void disable_cpufreq(void);
>
> @@ -250,6 +251,10 @@ static inline unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_max(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>         return 0;
>  }
> +static inline unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get_min(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
>  static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>