[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <107290.1690310391@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 19:39:51 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, bp@...en8.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, christian@...uner.io, dalias@...c.org,
davem@...emloft.net, deepa.kernel@...il.com, deller@....de,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, glebfm@...linux.org,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, hare@...e.com, hpa@...or.com,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, jhogan@...nel.org, kim.phillips@....com,
ldv@...linux.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, luto@...nel.org, mattst88@...il.com,
mingo@...hat.com, monstr@...str.eu, mpe@...erman.id.au,
namhyung@...nel.org, paulus@...ba.org, peterz@...radead.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, stefan@...er.ch,
tglx@...utronix.de, tony.luck@...el.com, tycho@...ho.ws,
will@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Add fchmodat2() - or add a more general syscall?
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Rather than adding a fchmodat2() syscall, should we add a
> > "set_file_attrs()" syscall that takes a mask and allows you to set a bunch
> > of stuff all in one go? Basically, an interface to notify_change() in the
> > kernel that would allow several stats to be set atomically. This might be
> > of particular interest to network filesystems.
>
> Do you mean atomically as in compare-and-swap (update only if old values
> match), or just a way to update multiple file attributes with a single
> system call?
I was thinking more in terms of the latter. AFAIK, there aren't any network
filesystems support a CAS interface on file attributes like that. To be able
to do a CAS operation, we'd need to pass in the old values as well as the new.
Another thing we could look at is doing "create_and_set_attrs()", possibly
allowing it to take a list of xattrs also.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists