[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4553b9cd-2450-31f4-2c04-6a9b93499190@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:49:51 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-cgroup v5 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: Support remote partitions
On 7/13/23 13:25, Waiman Long wrote:
> v5:
> - [v4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230627143508.1576882-1-longman@redhat.com/
> - Drop the first 4 patches as they had been merged.
> - Make cpuset.cpus.exclusive invariant once it is manually set. This
> also means the cpuset.cpus.exclusive may not show the effective value
> that is actually being used.
> - Update the documentation and test accordingly.
>
> v4:
> - [v3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230627005529.1564984-1-longman@redhat.com/
> - Fix compilation problem reported by kernel test robot.
>
> This patch series introduces a new cpuset control file
> "cpuset.cpus.exclusive" which must be a subset of "cpuset.cpus"
> and the parent's "cpuset.cpus.exclusive". This control file lists
> the exclusive CPUs to be distributed down the hierarchy. Any one
> of the exclusive CPUs can only be distributed to at most one child
> cpuset. Unlike "cpuset.cpus", invalid input to "cpuset.cpus.exclusive"
> will be rejected with an error. This new control file has no effect on
> the behavior of the cpuset until it turns into a partition root. At that
> point, its effective CPUs will be set to its exclusive CPUs unless some
> of them are offline.
>
> This patch series also introduces a new category of cpuset partition
> called remote partitions. The existing partition category where the
> partition roots have to be clustered around the root cgroup in a
> hierarchical way is now referred to as local partitions.
>
> A remote partition can be formed far from the root cgroup
> with no partition root parent. While local partitions can be
> created without touching "cpuset.cpus.exclusive" as it can be set
> automatically if a cpuset becomes a local partition root. Properly set
> "cpuset.cpus.exclusive" values down the hierarchy are required to create
> a remote partition.
>
> Both scheduling and isolated partitions can be formed in a remote
> partition. A local partition can be created under a remote partition.
> A remote partition, however, cannot be formed under a local partition
> for now.
>
> Modern container orchestration tools like Kubernetes use the cgroup
> hierarchy to manage different containers. And it is relying on other
> middleware like systemd to help managing it. If a container needs to
> use isolated CPUs, it is hard to get those with the local partitions
> as it will require the administrative parent cgroup to be a partition
> root too which tool like systemd may not be ready to manage.
>
> With this patch series, we allow the creation of remote partition
> far from the root. The container management tool can manage the
> "cpuset.cpus.exclusive" file without impacting the other cpuset
> files that are managed by other middlewares. Of course, invalid
> "cpuset.cpus.exclusive" values will be rejected.
>
> Waiman Long (5):
> cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive for v2
> cgroup/cpuset: Introduce remote partition
> cgroup/cpuset: Check partition conflict with housekeeping setup
> cgroup/cpuset: Documentation update for partition
> cgroup/cpuset: Extend test_cpuset_prs.sh to test remote partition
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 114 +-
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 1242 ++++++++++++-----
> .../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 419 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 1291 insertions(+), 484 deletions(-)
>
Tejun,
Do you have any further suggested change that you would like to see?
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists