[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d52f78f4-f36c-b905-edbc-1795fd7ba96f@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:26:08 -0700
From: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
<quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <robdclark@...il.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<vkoul@...nel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
<swboyd@...omium.org>, <sean@...rly.run>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v1 2/5] drm/msm/dp: incorporate pm_runtime
framework into DP driver
On 7/25/2023 3:33 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 26/07/2023 01:25, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>
>> On 7/10/2023 9:22 AM, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2023 7:52 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 04:52:20PM -0700, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>>> Incorporating pm runtime framework into DP driver so that power
>>>>> and clock resource handling can be centralized allowing easier
>>>>> control of these resources in preparation of registering aux bus
>>>>> uring probe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c | 3 ++
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 75
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
>>>>> index 8e3b677..c592064 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_aux.c
>>>>> @@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ static ssize_t dp_aux_transfer(struct
>>>>> drm_dp_aux *dp_aux,
>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dp_aux->dev);
>>>>> mutex_lock(&aux->mutex);
>>>>> if (!aux->initted) {
>>>>> ret = -EIO;
>>>>> @@ -364,6 +365,8 @@ static ssize_t dp_aux_transfer(struct
>>>>> drm_dp_aux *dp_aux,
>>>>> exit:
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&aux->mutex);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dp_aux->dev);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dp_aux->dev);
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> }
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>>>> index 76f1395..2c5706a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>>>> @@ -309,6 +309,10 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device
>>>>> *dev, struct device *master,
>>>>> goto end;
>>>>> }
>>>>> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, 1000);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> end:
>>>>> return rc;
>>>>> @@ -320,9 +324,8 @@ static void dp_display_unbind(struct device
>>>>> *dev, struct device *master,
>>>>> struct dp_display_private *dp =
>>>>> dev_get_dp_display_private(dev);
>>>>> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(master);
>>>>> - /* disable all HPD interrupts */
>>>>> - if (dp->core_initialized)
>>>>> - dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog,
>>>>> DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK, false);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>>>>> kthread_stop(dp->ev_tsk);
>>>>> @@ -466,10 +469,12 @@ static void dp_display_host_init(struct
>>>>> dp_display_private *dp)
>>>>> dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
>>>>> dp->phy_initialized);
>>>>> - dp_power_init(dp->power);
>>>>> - dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(dp->ctrl, true);
>>>>> - dp_aux_init(dp->aux);
>>>>> - dp->core_initialized = true;
>>>>> + if (!dp->core_initialized) {
>>>>> + dp_power_init(dp->power);
>>>>> + dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(dp->ctrl, true);
>>>>> + dp_aux_init(dp->aux);
>>>>> + dp->core_initialized = true;
>>>> There are two cases that queries core_initialized, both of those are
>>>> done to avoid accessing the DP block without it first being powered
>>>> up.
>>>> With the introduction of runtime PM, it seems reasonable to just power
>>>> up the block in those two code paths (and remove the variable).
>>>>
>>>>> + }
>>>>> }
>>>>> static void dp_display_host_deinit(struct dp_display_private *dp)
>>>>> @@ -478,10 +483,12 @@ static void dp_display_host_deinit(struct
>>>>> dp_display_private *dp)
>>>>> dp->dp_display.connector_type, dp->core_initialized,
>>>>> dp->phy_initialized);
>>>>> - dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(dp->ctrl, false);
>>>>> - dp_aux_deinit(dp->aux);
>>>>> - dp_power_deinit(dp->power);
>>>>> - dp->core_initialized = false;
>>>>> + if (dp->core_initialized) {
>>>>> + dp_ctrl_reset_irq_ctrl(dp->ctrl, false);
>>>>> + dp_aux_deinit(dp->aux);
>>>>> + dp_power_deinit(dp->power);
>>>>> + dp->core_initialized = false;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> }
>>>>> static int dp_display_usbpd_configure_cb(struct device *dev)
>>>>> @@ -1304,6 +1311,39 @@ static int dp_display_remove(struct
>>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> dp_display_deinit_sub_modules(dp);
>>>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int dp_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>>>> + struct msm_dp *dp_display = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> platform_get_drvdata() is a wrapper for
>>>> dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev), so
>>>> there's no need to resolve the platform_device first...
>>>>
>>>>> + struct dp_display_private *dp;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dp = container_of(dp_display, struct dp_display_private,
>>>>> dp_display);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dp_display_host_phy_exit(dp);
>>>>> + dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_enable(dp->catalog);
>>>>> + dp_display_host_deinit(dp);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static int dp_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>>>> + struct msm_dp *dp_display = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>> + struct dp_display_private *dp;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dp = container_of(dp_display, struct dp_display_private,
>>>>> dp_display);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dp_display_host_init(dp);
>>>>> + if (dp_display->is_edp) {
>>>>> + dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_enable(dp->catalog);
>>>>> + dp_display_host_phy_init(dp);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -1409,6 +1449,7 @@ static int dp_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>>> }
>>>>> static const struct dev_pm_ops dp_pm_ops = {
>>>>> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dp_pm_runtime_suspend,
>>>>> dp_pm_runtime_resume, NULL)
>>>>> .suspend = dp_pm_suspend,
>>>>> .resume = dp_pm_resume,
>>>>> };
>>>>> @@ -1493,10 +1534,6 @@ static int
>>>>> dp_display_get_next_bridge(struct msm_dp *dp)
>>>>> aux_bus = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "aux-bus");
>>>>> if (aux_bus && dp->is_edp) {
>>>>> - dp_display_host_init(dp_priv);
>>>>> - dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_enable(dp_priv->catalog);
>>>>> - dp_display_host_phy_init(dp_priv);
>>>> I'm probably just missing it, but how do we get here with the host
>>>> powered up and the phy initialized?
>>>
>>> if (!dp->core_initialized) is at dp_display_host_init()
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * The code below assumes that the panel will finish
>>>>> probing
>>>>> * by the time devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices()
>>>>> returns.
>>>>> @@ -1604,6 +1641,7 @@ void dp_bridge_atomic_enable(struct
>>>>> drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
>>>>> dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp_display, 0);
>>>>> mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&dp_display->pdev->dev);
>>>>> state = dp_display->hpd_state;
>>>>> if (state != ST_DISPLAY_OFF && state != ST_MAINLINK_READY) {
>>>>> @@ -1684,6 +1722,8 @@ void dp_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct
>>>>> drm_bridge *drm_bridge,
>>>>> }
>>>>> drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "type=%d Done\n",
>>>>> dp->connector_type);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&dp_display->pdev->dev);
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -1723,6 +1763,8 @@ void dp_bridge_hpd_enable(struct
>>>>> drm_bridge *bridge)
>>>>> struct dp_display_private *dp = container_of(dp_display,
>>>>> struct dp_display_private, dp_display);
>>>>> mutex_lock(&dp->event_mutex);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&dp->pdev->dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_enable(dp->catalog);
>>>>> /* enable HDP interrupts */
>>>>> @@ -1744,6 +1786,9 @@ void dp_bridge_hpd_disable(struct drm_bridge
>>>>> *bridge)
>>>>> dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_disable(dp->catalog);
>>>>> dp_display->internal_hpd = false;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&dp->pdev->dev);
>>>>> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&dp->pdev->dev);
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&dp->event_mutex);
>>>>> }
>>>> The runtime_get/put in dp_bridge_hpd_enable() and disable matches my
>>>> expectations. But in the case that we have an external HPD source,
>>>> where
>>>> will the power be turned on?
>>>>
>>>> Note that you can test this on your device by routing the HPD GPIO
>>>> to a
>>>> display-connector instance and wiring this to the DP node. In the same
>>>> way it's done here:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8295p-adp.dts#n28
>>>>
>>
>> at sc7280, gpio-47 has function 2 as dp-hot-plug pin. but it does not
>> has function for general purpose pin.
>
> It has a 'gpio' function, so that the pin can be used as a generic
> GPIO with a dp-connector device.
function 0 is for PBL_DEBUG2, which function # should I use?
>
>>
>> Just curious, to work with external HPD source,
>>
>> 1) which DRM_BRIDGE_OP_xxx should be used for bridge->ops?
>
> There is no difference. The drm_bridge_connector will select the
> bridges according to the needs. E.g. the dp-connector can provide
> DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT / OP_HPD (if the hpd-gpios property is
> configured). If it does, it will be selected for detection/HPD
> handling. If not, the main dp bridge will handle these operations.
can you please point me out where "hpd-gpios" info get parsed and
during polling where the gpio status get read from?
Thanks,
>
>>
>> 2) are both .hpd_enable and .hpd_disable have to be populated?
>
> No, they are both optional.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists