linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 8/8] selftests/nolibc: add test support for powerpc64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZL9leVOI25S2+0+g@1wt.eu>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:02:33 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, thomas@...ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 8/8] selftests/nolibc: add test support for powerpc64

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 01:50:31PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Hi, Willy
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 05:18:32AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > >  # ARCH is supported by kernel
> > > +ARCH_powerpc64   = powerpc
> > >  ARCH_powerpc64le = powerpc
> > 
> > And similarly let's simply call this one ppc64.
> >
> 
> Well, I like these short ones too, what about also a ppc alias for
> powerpc?
> 
>     ARCH_ppc     = powerpc
>     ARCH_ppc64   = powerpc
>     ARCH_ppc64le = powerpc

I thought about it as well. It could avoid the confusion between the
arch name (powerpc) that's used for both 32/64 and the user-requested
one.

Willy