[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0101c83334721e28b603211c427941e8d31ea9d8.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:18:48 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, ankita@...dia.com,
naoya.horiguchi@....com, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
aniketa@...dia.com, cjia@...dia.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
targupta@...dia.com, vsethi@...dia.com, acurrid@...dia.com,
apopple@...dia.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, danw@...dia.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Clint Sbisa <csbisa@...zon.com>, osamaabb@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] kvm: determine memory type from VMA
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 12:35 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:30:23 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 08:09:02AM -0700, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > > In terms of security for arm64 at least, Device vs Normal NC (or nc vs
> > > wc in Linux terminology) doesn't make much difference with the former
> > > occasionally being worse. The kernel would probably trust the DPDK code
> > > if it allows direct device access.
> >
> > RDMA and DRM already allow device drivers to map WC to userspace on
> > demand, we expect the platform to support this.
> >
> > > > So the userspace component needs to be responsible for selecting the
> > > > mapping, the same way using the PCI sysfs resource files today allows
> > > > to do that by selecting the _wc variant.
> > >
> > > I guess the sysfs interface is just trying to work around the VFIO
> > > limitations.
> >
> > I think just nobody has ever asked for VFIO WC support. The main
> > non-VM user is DPDK and none of the NIC drivers have wanted this (DPDK
> > applications areis more of throughput than latency focused typically)
>
> Yes, QEMU can't know whether the device or driver want a WC BAR
> mapping, so we've left it for KVM manipulation relative to VM use
> cases. Nobody has followed through with a complete proposal to enable
> it otherwise for direct userspace driver access, but I don't think
> there's opposition to providing such a thing. Thanks,
Ok, this is really backburner work for me but I'll try to cook up a POC
patch in the near (hopefully) future along the lines of the subregions
I proposed and we can discuss from there.
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists