[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230725095851.5cbd7b6d@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:58:51 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/12] drm/shmem-helper: Refactor locked/unlocked
functions
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:47:02 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 02:47:44 +0300
> Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> > Add locked/unlocked postfixes to drm-shmem function names to make clear
> > where reservation lock is taken and where not.
>
> Uh, ignore my comment on patch 1 then...
>
> > Add more common helpers to drm_gem_shmem_helper.h
>
> I'd do the renaming and exporting in separate patches.
Actually, I'd refrain from exporting functions until someone needs
them, as you rightfully pointed out in your previous reply.
>
> >
> > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists