[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <938e9198-8684-6e1b-d3a9-4601bedd2004@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:42:21 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
stratos-dev@...lists.linaro.org,
Erik Schilling <erik.schilling@...aro.org>,
Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] xen: privcmd: Add support for irqfd
On 25.07.23 08:47, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Xen provides support for injecting interrupts to the guests via the
> HYPERVISOR_dm_op() hypercall. The same is used by the Virtio based
> device backend implementations, in an inefficient manner currently.
>
> Generally, the Virtio backends are implemented to work with the Eventfd
> based mechanism. In order to make such backends work with Xen, another
> software layer needs to poll the Eventfds and raise an interrupt to the
> guest using the Xen based mechanism. This results in an extra context
> switch.
>
> This is not a new problem in Linux though. It is present with other
> hypervisors like KVM, etc. as well. The generic solution implemented in
> the kernel for them is to provide an IOCTL call to pass the interrupt
> details and eventfd, which lets the kernel take care of polling the
> eventfd and raising of the interrupt, instead of handling this in user
> space (which involves an extra context switch).
>
> This patch adds support to inject a specific interrupt to guest using
> the eventfd mechanism, by preventing the extra context switch.
>
> Inspired by existing implementations for KVM, etc..
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> V2.1->V3
> - No changes
>
> V2->V2.1
> - Select EVENTFD from Kconfig
>
> V1->V2:
> - Improve error handling.
> - Remove the unnecessary usage of list_for_each_entry_safe().
> - Restrict the use of XEN_DMOP_set_irq_level to only ARM64.
>
> drivers/xen/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 276 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/xen/privcmd.h | 14 ++
> 3 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Kconfig b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> index d5d7c402b651..7967393c55a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ config XEN_SCSI_BACKEND
> config XEN_PRIVCMD
> tristate "Xen hypercall passthrough driver"
> depends on XEN
> + select EVENTFD
I don't like this. Can we maybe add another bool config item depending on
XEN_PRIVCMD, EVENTFD and XEN_VIRTIO, which can then be used to guard the
code additions to privcmd.c?
This would avoid adding additional code for everyone.
Juergen
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists