linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] ALSA: hda/i915: Allow override of gpu binding.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87351ctc8m.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:19:21 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Péter Ujfalusi 
        <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] ALSA: hda/i915: Allow override of gpu binding.

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:52:32 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> 
> >>>> @@ -121,6 +128,9 @@ static int i915_gfx_present(struct pci_dev
> >>>> *hdac_pci)
> >>>>   {
> >>>>       struct pci_dev *display_dev = NULL;
> >>>>   +    if (!gpu_bind || (gpu_bind < 0 &&
> >>>> video_firmware_drivers_only()))
> >>>> +        return false;
> >>
> >>
> >> Bear with me since I am just going back to work mode but I can't figure
> >> out what the second part of the test does
> >>
> >> bool video_firmware_drivers_only(void)
> >> {
> >>     return video_nomodeset;
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(video_firmware_drivers_only);
> >>
> >> and video_nomodeset=1 by default, so why would we return false when
> >> gpu_bind = -1?
> >>
> >> This seems to be a change of functionality, what am I missing?
> > video_nomodeset is 0 by default, only when nomodeset is given as
> > argument is it set to 1. :-)
> 
> 
> I must be missing something on how the default is handled.
> 
> bool video_firmware_drivers_only(void)
> {
> 	return video_nomodeset;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(video_firmware_drivers_only);
> 
> static int __init disable_modeset(char *str)
> {
> 	video_nomodeset = true;
> 
> isn't default 'true' then?

disable_modeset() is called *only* when nomodeset boot option is
given.  Then it overrides the value to true.


Takashi