[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202307252010.fbqRILwZ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:27:22 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>,
Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/13] coresight-tpdm: Add nodes for dsb edge control
Hi Tao,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.5-rc3 next-20230725]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tao-Zhang/coresight-tpdm-Remove-the-unnecessary-lock/20230725-152235
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1690269353-10829-10-git-send-email-quic_taozha%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH v7 09/13] coresight-tpdm: Add nodes for dsb edge control
config: arm-randconfig-r003-20230725 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230725/202307252010.fbqRILwZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230725/202307252010.fbqRILwZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307252010.fbqRILwZ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c: In function 'dsb_edge_ctrl_val_store':
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c:383:28: warning: variable 'mask' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
383 | unsigned long val, mask, edge_ctrl;
| ^~~~
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c: In function 'dsb_edge_ctrl_mask_store':
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c:449:9: warning: this 'else' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
449 | else
| ^~~~
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c:451:17: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'else'
451 | drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[reg] = set;
| ^~~~~~~
vim +/mask +383 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
368
369 /*
370 * This function is used to control the edge detection according
371 * to the index number that has been set.
372 * "edge_ctrl" should be one of the following values.
373 * 0 - Rising edge detection
374 * 1 - Falling edge detection
375 * 2 - Rising and falling edge detection (toggle detection)
376 */
377 static ssize_t dsb_edge_ctrl_val_store(struct device *dev,
378 struct device_attribute *attr,
379 const char *buf,
380 size_t size)
381 {
382 struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
> 383 unsigned long val, mask, edge_ctrl;
384 int reg;
385
386 if ((kstrtoul(buf, 0, &edge_ctrl)) || (edge_ctrl > 0x2))
387 return -EINVAL;
388
389 spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
390 /*
391 * There are 2 bit per DSB Edge Control line.
392 * Thus we have 16 lines in a 32bit word.
393 */
394 reg = EDCR_TO_WORD_IDX(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_idx);
395 mask = EDCR_TO_WORD_MASK(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_idx);
396 val = drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl[reg];
397 val &= ~EDCR_TO_WORD_MASK(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_idx);
398 val |= EDCR_TO_WORD_VAL(edge_ctrl, drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_idx);
399 drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl[reg] = val;
400 spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
401
402 return size;
403 }
404 static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_edge_ctrl_val);
405
406 static ssize_t dsb_edge_ctrl_mask_show(struct device *dev,
407 struct device_attribute *attr,
408 char *buf)
409 {
410 struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
411 ssize_t size = 0;
412 unsigned long bytes;
413 int i;
414
415 spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
416 for (i = 0; i < TPDM_DSB_MAX_EDCMR; i++) {
417 bytes = sysfs_emit_at(buf, size,
418 "Val:0x%x\n", drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[i]);
419 if (bytes <= 0)
420 break;
421 size += bytes;
422 }
423 spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
424 return size;
425 }
426
427 static ssize_t dsb_edge_ctrl_mask_store(struct device *dev,
428 struct device_attribute *attr,
429 const char *buf,
430 size_t size)
431 {
432 struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
433 unsigned long val;
434 u32 set;
435 int reg;
436
437 if ((kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val)) || (val & ~1UL))
438 return -EINVAL;
439
440 spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
441 /*
442 * There is 1 bit per DSB Edge Control Mark line.
443 * Thus we have 32 lines in a 32bit word.
444 */
445 reg = EDCMR_TO_WORD_IDX(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_idx);
446 set = drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[reg];
447 if (val)
448 set |= BIT(EDCMR_TO_WORD_SHIFT(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_idx));
> 449 else
450 set &= ~BIT(EDCMR_TO_WORD_SHIFT(drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_idx));
451 drvdata->dsb->edge_ctrl_mask[reg] = set;
452 spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
453
454 return size;
455 }
456 static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_edge_ctrl_mask);
457
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists