linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable various configs for TI platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ace112fe-978c-a518-2be5-3f3d1f7fd29c@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:38:51 +0530
From:   "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC:     <vigneshr@...com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
        <geert+renesas@...der.be>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, <rafal@...ecki.pl>, <peng.fan@....com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>,
        Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
        MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
        Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>,
        Judith Mendez <jm@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable various configs for TI
 platforms

Thanks Nishanth

On 7/26/2023 7:13 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> on $subject: I think mentioning K3 will help narrow things down a bit.
>
> On 19:00-20230726, Udit Kumar wrote:
>> Enable TI ECAP, DP83869 driver, TI OMAP2, K3 remote proc
> I think you mean to state TI mailbox and not omap2 :)

Not really :)

This driver TI OMAP2, (CONFIG_OMAP2PLUS_MBOX) is used in

TI K3 platforms as well for communications with remote processors.

Rest comments will address in v3.


>
>> SND_SOC_J721E_EVM, MCAN, UFS and RTI driver to be built
>> as module.
>> These are needed on different TI platforms.
> Please elaborate the list of boards this benefits TI platforms are a
> big variant list. TI Platforms is too generic a term that scales
> architectures.. that is not the point you are trying to make.
>> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>
> If the various contributers are ok, just my 2 cents:
> Could you drop all other sign-offs other than yours? I understand the
> contributions from various members on the TI SDK tree, but I'vent seen
> them attempt to upstream and you took the effort in ensuring the new
> squashed patch contains all the relevant components.
>
> [..]