[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BF89A302-B6A1-4854-AAC1-015B5BC1DD91@hpe.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:43:47 +0000
From: "Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "Verdun, Jean-Marie" <verdun@....com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] dt-bindings: net: Add HPE GXP UMAC
Note: Resend in correct format.
> > > Do both ports get the sane MAC address?
> >
> > No they do not. The first one will get the MAC address, the second
> > will be an external phy we are managing via the MDIO path.
> Then please put the mac-address property in the correct place, inside
port@0.
Greetings Andrew,
I was mistaken, the Mac address belongs with UMAC,
not the phys. The reason ports are listed here is
because having two separate phy-handles
in one node is not allowed. The layout of the
hardware inside the GXP is unconventional.
There is a description of the layout in the cover-letter,
I see though I need to add a better description.
The internal-phy is connected to the external
phy via SGMII. To use UMAC0 we need to
configure both the internal, and external phy to enable
networking.
Ideally it would be something like this:
umac0: umac@...0 {
compatible = "hpe, gxp-umac";
reg = <0x4000 0x80>;
interrupts = <10>;
interrupt-parent = <&vic0>;
mac-address = [94 18 82 16 04 d8];
ext-phy-handle = <&ext_phy0>;
int-phy-handle = <&int_phy0>;
};
Thanks,
-Nick Hawkins
Powered by blists - more mailing lists