linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix OOB read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230726151903.GD5148@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 18:19:03 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc:     Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        stable@...nel.org, Zubin Mithra <zsm@...omium.org>,
        Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix OOB read

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 26.07.23 10:38, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 10:33, Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> >> On 26.07.23 10:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> (CC'ing Kai and Thorsten who have added the check to checkpatch)
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:24:50AM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 23:34, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:46:54PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> >>>>>> If the index provided by the user is bigger than the mask size, we might do an
> >>>>>> out of bound read.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CC: stable@...nel.org
> >>>>>> Fixes: 40140eda661e ("media: uvcvideo: Implement mask for V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_MENU")
> >>>>>> Reported-by: Zubin Mithra <zsm@...omium.org>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> checkpatch now requests a Reported-by tag to be immediately followed by
> >>>>> a Closes
> >>
> >> Not that it matters, the changes I performed only required a Link: tag,
> >> which is how things should have been done for many years already. It
> >> later became Closes: due to patches from Matthieu. But whatever. :-D
> > 
> > I prefer to leave the Reported-by and remove the Closes, that way we
> > credit the reporter (assuming they approved to be referred).
> > 
> > But if that is not possible, just remove the reported-by. A private
> > link is pretty much noise on the tree.
> 
> Yeah, of course that's the right strategy (Linus made it pretty clear
> that he doesn't want any private links) in case the reporter okay with
> the Reported-by. Sorry, forgot to cover that case in my reply.

I'll keep the Reported-by and omit the Link/Closes tags.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart