[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08f1bbda-7d41-9b1b-c345-54f4c62ff976@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:27:47 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/29] x86/cpu: Rework the topology evaluation
On 7/26/2023 3:38 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> There is a real and unrelated snafu vs. that logical package and logical
> die management which I discovered today. I missed the fact that this
> cruft abuses cpuinfo as permanent storage, which breaks CPU
> offline/online as the online operation reinitializes the topology
> information.
>
> I pushed out a fixed version to
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git x86/topology
>
> earlier. It doesn't have a tag yet.
>
Thanks, I'll try this out and experiment with CPU hotplug as well.
-Sohil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists