linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: msm: sm6125-mdss: drop unneeded status from examples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:27:45 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: msm: sm6125-mdss: drop unneeded
 status from examples

On 25/07/2023 13:46, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-07-25 12:16:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Example DTS should not have 'status' property.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6125-mdss.yaml   | 6 ------
> 
> This is not needed: it has already been corrected in v3 and v4 of the
> respective series (among other changes) and the patches were only picked
> to a preliminary (draft) pull to get an overview of the outstanding work
> for this subsystem.  That branch happens to be included in regular -next
> releases though.
> 
> 6.6 drm/msm display pull: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/merge_requests/69
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230718-sm6125-dpu-v3-0-6c5a56e99820@somainline.org/
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230723-sm6125-dpu-v4-0-a3f287dd6c07@somainline.org/

What do you mean? The old code (one I am fixing) is in current next...

If this was fixed, why next gets some outdated branches of drm next?
Each maintainers next tree is supposed to be fed into the next, without
delays.

Best regards,
Krzysztof