[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e2b2819-dc54-4038-0046-712a3391c595@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 13:10:54 +0530
From: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<ekangupt@....qualcomm.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<fastrpc.upstream@....qualcomm.com>, stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] misc: fastrpc: Fix incorrect DMA mapping unmap request
On 7/26/2023 12:00 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:39:31PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
>> Scatterlist table is obtained during map create request and the same
>
> I'm guessing that this all happens in fastrpc_map_create() where:
>
> map->table = dma_buf_map_attachment_unlocked(map->attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>
> fails, we jump to map_err, and then call fastrpc_map_put(map), which
> then ends up in the code below?
>
yes, your understanding is correct.
>> table is used for DMA mapping unmap. In case there is any failure
>> while getting the sg_table, ERR_PTR is returned instead of sg_table.
>
> The problem isn't that ERR_PTR() is being returned, the problem is that
> this is being assigned to map->table and you keep running.
>
>>
>> When the map is getting freed, there is only a non-NULL check of
>> sg_table which will also be true in case failure was returned instead
>> of sg_table. This would result in improper unmap request. Add proper
>> check to avoid bad unmap request.
>>
>> Fixes: c68cfb718c8f ("misc: fastrpc: Add support for context Invoke method")
>> Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
>> Tested-by: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
>
> You always test your own patches, so no need to declare this.
>
sure, I'll avoid adding this for future changes.
>> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Added fixes information to commit text
>>
>> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> index 9666d28..75da69a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void fastrpc_free_map(struct kref *ref)
>>
>> map = container_of(ref, struct fastrpc_map, refcount);
>>
>> - if (map->table) {
>> + if (map->table && !IS_ERR(map->table)) {
>
> Rather than carrying around an IS_ERR(map->table), I think you should
> address this at the originating place. E.g. assign the return value of
> the dma_buf_map_attachment_unlocked() to a local variable and only if it
> is valid you assign map->table. Or perhaps make it NULL in the error
> path.
>
understood, this looks much cleaner solution. I'll update this in the
next patch. Thanks for taking your time to review this change, Bjorn.
--ekansh
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> if (map->attr & FASTRPC_ATTR_SECUREMAP) {
>> struct qcom_scm_vmperm perm;
>> int vmid = map->fl->cctx->vmperms[0].vmid;
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists