linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:20:00 +0800
From:   "chenjiahao (C)" <chenjiahao16@...wei.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
        <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, <guoren@...nel.org>,
        <heiko@...ech.de>, <bjorn@...osinc.com>, <alex@...ti.fr>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        <bhe@...hat.com>, <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>, <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v8 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G
 explicitly on riscv


On 2023/7/26 5:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Your $subject says -next, but the patch failed to apply to
> riscv/for-next. What was the base for this patchset?
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.

Hi,

My patchset was tested on current linux-next HEAD
(commit ID: 1e25dd777248, tag: next-20230725) and
it seems all ok.

Could you try applying with the base above, or
is there any problem with that base?

Thanks,
Jiahao