[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023072657-unloved-magma-8cf2@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 13:38:22 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jiaqing Zhao <jiaqing.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Gerhard Uttenthaler <uttenthaler@...-wuensche.com>,
support@...-wuensche.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] can: ems_pci: move ASIX AX99100 ids to pci_ids.h
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:54:01PM +0800, Jiaqing Zhao wrote:
> On 2023-07-20 18:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 20.07.2023 10:28:59, Jiaqing Zhao wrote:
> >> Move PCI Vendor and Device ID of ASIX AX99100 PCIe to Multi I/O
> >> Controller to pci_ids.h for its serial and parallel port driver
> >> support in subsequent patches.
> >
> > Sorry, I haven't noticed the change in "include/linux/pci_ids.h", that
> > the other patches depend on. How to coordinate among the subsystems?
> >
> > I don't mind taking the entire (v1) series with the Acks from the
> > tty/serial and parport maintainers, or give my Acked-by to upstream
> > via their trees.
>
> Add tty and parport maintainers to this thread.
>
> I'd like to ask other maintainers' opinion as I'm not sure which option
> is better and I had no similar experience before.
Either is fine with me, I can just take them all through my tty tree as
that's simplest for me :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists