lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7jxr06t.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:47:06 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Cc:     Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
        Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
        Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
        Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/12] KVM: arm64: Define kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range()

On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 03:22:47 +0100,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> Implement the helper kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() that acts
> as a wrapper for range-based TLB invalidations. For the
> given VMID, use the range-based TLBI instructions to do
> the job or fallback to invalidating all the TLB entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c         | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index 8294a9a7e566..5e8b1ff07854 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -754,4 +754,14 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
>   *	   kvm_pgtable_prot format.
>   */
>  enum kvm_pgtable_prot kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(kvm_pte_t pte);
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() - Invalidate/flush a range of TLB entries
> + *
> + * @mmu:	Stage-2 KVM MMU struct
> + * @addr:	The base Intermediate physical address from which to invalidate
> + * @size:	Size of the range from the base to invalidate
> + */
> +void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> +				phys_addr_t addr, size_t size);
>  #endif	/* __ARM64_KVM_PGTABLE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index aa740a974e02..5d14d5d5819a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -670,6 +670,26 @@ static bool stage2_has_fwb(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt)
>  	return !(pgt->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_S2_NOFWB);
>  }
>  
> +void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> +				phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pages, inval_pages;
> +
> +	if (!system_supports_tlb_range()) {
> +		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, mmu);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	while (pages > 0) {
> +		inval_pages = min(pages, MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES);
> +		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range, mmu, addr, inval_pages);
> +
> +		addr += inval_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		pages -= inval_pages;
> +	}
> +}
> +

This really shouldn't live in pgtable.c. This code gets linked into
the EL2 object. What do you think happens if, for some reason, this
gets called *from EL2*?

Furthermore, this doesn't deal with page tables at all. Why isn't
mmu.c a convenient place for it, as an integral part of
kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range?

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ