[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230727130008.jx3olv4pwpdsrui2@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:00:08 +0300
From: kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
n.borisov.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with
the spec
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:25:05PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG". Currently, the kernel
> doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses
> prefix "TDX_" for all of them. Although it's arguable whether the TDX
> spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow
> the spec when naming those macros.
>
> Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec. As
> a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs,
> which all have prefix "TDH".
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
I remember we had few back-and-forth on naming this defines. I think
matching names to the spec is helpful for future readers:
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists