linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI/IORT: Remove erroneous id_count check in iort_node_get_rmr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 14:59:02 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
Cc:     Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        guohanjun@...wei.com, sudeep.holla@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        alikernel-developer@...ux.alibaba.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI/IORT: Remove erroneous id_count check in
 iort_node_get_rmr_info()

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:39:27PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 07:33:45PM +0800, Guanghui Feng wrote:
> > According to the ARM IORT specifications DEN 0049 issue E,
> > the "Number of IDs" field in the ID mapping format reports
> > the number of IDs in the mapping range minus one.
> > 
> > In iort_node_get_rmr_info(), we erroneously skip ID mappings
> > whose "Number of IDs" equal to 0, resulting in valid mapping
> > nodes with a single ID to map being skipped, which is wrong.
> > 
> > Fix iort_node_get_rmr_info() by removing the bogus id_count
> > check.
> > 
> > Fixes: 491cf4a6735a ("ACPI/IORT: Add support to retrieve IORT RMR reserved regions")
> > Signed-off-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
> 
> Catalin/Will,
> 
> can you pick this up please ?

Would you like it merged in 6.5 or 6.6 is fine?

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin