[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230727030347.3552992-1-carlos.song@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 11:03:47 +0800
From: carlos.song@....com
To: andi.shyti@...nel.org, aisheng.dong@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com
Cc: carlos.song@....com, xiaoning.wang@....com, haibo.chen@....com,
linux-imx@....com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] i2c: imx-lpi2c: directly return ISR when detect a NACK
From: Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>
A NACK flag in ISR means i2c bus error. In such condition,
there is no need to do read/write operation.
In this patch, i2c will check MSR_NDF, MSR_RDF and MSR_TDF
flag in turn, it's making mutually exclusive NACK/read/write.
So when a NACK is received(MSR_NDF), i2c will return ISR
directly and then stop i2c transfer.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Song <carlos.song@....com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
index 150d923ca7f1..9a3e3a1bc4ee 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
@@ -517,14 +517,12 @@ static irqreturn_t lpi2c_imx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
temp = readl(lpi2c_imx->base + LPI2C_MSR);
temp &= enabled;
- if (temp & MSR_RDF)
- lpi2c_imx_read_rxfifo(lpi2c_imx);
-
- if (temp & MSR_TDF)
- lpi2c_imx_write_txfifo(lpi2c_imx);
-
if (temp & MSR_NDF)
complete(&lpi2c_imx->complete);
+ else if (temp & MSR_RDF)
+ lpi2c_imx_read_rxfifo(lpi2c_imx);
+ else if (temp & MSR_TDF)
+ lpi2c_imx_write_txfifo(lpi2c_imx);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists