lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7d0f4c2-dd88-4ad2-8405-3c9b5d8cbb39@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 23:04:04 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        "open list:SLEEPABLE READ-COPY UPDATE (SRCU)" <rcu@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] srcu: Fix error handling in init_srcu_struct_fields()



On 7/26/23 17:07, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> -				free_percpu(ssp->sda);
>> -				ssp->sda = NULL;
>> -				kfree(ssp->srcu_sup);
>> -				return -ENOMEM;
>> -			}
>> -		} else {
>> +		if (!init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp, GFP_ATOMIC))
>> +			goto err_free_sda;
>> +		else
>>  			WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state, SRCU_SIZE_BIG);
> Given that the "then" clause is a goto, what is the "else" clause doing
> for us?
> 

Not much. Agreed we can get rid of "else" and reduce indent of the
WRITE_ONCE that follows.

Would you mind making this fixup in the patch for your apply, or would
you like me to refresh the patch? Let me know either way, thank you!

 - Joel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ