lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMKQ2OuFy1deZktP@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:44:24 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
Cc:     Joerg Reuter <jreuter@...na.de>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, willy@...radead.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
        linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] ax.25: Update to register_net_sysctl_sz

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:31:12PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> There are no deltas in this patch set. We start seeing the deltas when
> we start removing with the next 6 chunks. I'll try to make that more
> clear in the commit message.

Indeed, even if no deltas are created it is importan then to say that.
If there are no deltas the "why" becomes more important. If the why is
to make it easier to apply subsequent patches, that must be said. When
you iterate your new series try to review the patches as if you were not
the person submitting them, and try to think of ways to make it easier
for the patch reviewer to do less work. The less work and easier patch
review is the better for them.

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ