linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: tiny-usb: check usb base class before assuming the interface on device is for this driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:00:35 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To:     Harry Geyer <harry.geyer@...tank.co.uk>
Cc:     Till Harbaum <till@...baum.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: tiny-usb: check usb base class before assuming the
 interface on device is for this driver

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:42PM +0100, Harry Geyer wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> On 27/07/2023 12:30, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > On the other hand, checkpatch is OK with lines up to 100
> > characters and this one looks like it's withing that length. So,
> > up to your personal preference.
> I am happy to resend the patch.

Thanks!

> > If you resend it, you can add my r-b.
> Not sure what you mean, I am sorry. Please, can you explain what you want me
> to do.

I was meaning that you could add my Reviewed-by:... you can
also ignore it, I can r-b it later.

Thanks,
Andi

PS r-b = Reviewed-by, if this was the reason of confusion :)