[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64213517-099b-e5a7-6cf3-2f78fa59ee99@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 18:15:19 +0100
From: "Colin King (gmail)" <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] net: ethernet: slicoss: remove redundant increment
of pointer data
On 26/07/2023 21:05, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> The pointer data is being incremented but this change to the pointer
>> is not used afterwards. The increment is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Are imperative change descriptions still preferred?
Hrm, I've used this style of commit message for a few thousand commits,
I hope it's still fine.
>
> See also:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.5-rc3#n94
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists