[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBLjE051KeFzFZzjc=0ZuMHOQwRfWasxWRUOSwQO3jqYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 21:14:51 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Alexey Romanov <avromanov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: narmstrong@...libre.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
olivia@...enic.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, khilman@...libre.com, jbrunet@...libre.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...rdevices.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] drivers: rng: add check status bit feature
Hello Alexey,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:13 PM Alexey Romanov <avromanov@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
[...]
> static int meson_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max, bool wait)
> {
> struct meson_rng_data *data =
> container_of(rng, struct meson_rng_data, rng);
> + const struct meson_rng_priv *priv = data->priv;
> +
> + if (priv->check_status_bit) {
> + void __iomem *cfg_addr = data->base + priv->cfg_offset;
> + int err;
Have you considered just creating two separate functions:
- meson_rng_read
- meson_s4_rng_read
Then you don't need all of these if/else.
You can even skip the whole offset description in your new struct
meson_rng_priv.
All of this can make the code easier to understand.
> + writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(cfg_addr) | BIT(SEED_READY_STS_BIT), cfg_addr);
Why not just #define SEED_READY_STS as BIT(...) right away?
Best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists