[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZML0qwKTG5zB4VwL@snowbird>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:50:19 -0700
From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com,
mawupeng1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] percpu: some trivial cleanup patches
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:30:14AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 07/21/23 at 02:04pm, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 09:17:57PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > There's a left issue in my mailbox about percpu code at below. When
> > > I rechecked it and considered Dennis's comment, I made an attmept
> > > to fix it with patch 3.
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y407wDMKq5ibE9sc@fedora/T/#u
> > >
> > > Patch 1 and 2 are trivial clean up patches when reading percpu code.
> > >
> > > Baoquan He (3):
> > > mm/percpu.c: remove redundant check
> > > mm/percpu.c: optimize the code in pcpu_setup_first_chunk() a little
> > > bit
> > > mm/percpu.c: print error message too if atomic alloc failed
> > >
> > > mm/percpu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for these. I left a few comments. I think I might have some stuff
> > for v6.6, I'll figure that out in a couple days. If that's so, I can
> > pull 1, probably massage 2 and send that out again, and then I think
> > you'll need to resend 3.
>
> Sure, thanks for careful reviewing and great suggestion. So I only need
> to send v2 of patch 3, right? Or I should change and send v2 of the
> whold series? I may not get it clear.
>
Sorry for the delay. I've pulled 1 and 2 (reworded the comment). Can you
please resend patch 3.
Thanks,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists