linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 3/6] iommufd: Add iommufd_access_change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d7d275ff12c1c991ac80392b19f1ebf5214177d.1690440730.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:23:08 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To:     <jgg@...dia.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC:     <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <joro@...tes.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <robin.murphy@....com>, <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        <shuah@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/6] iommufd: Add iommufd_access_change_ioas helper

The complication of the mutex and refcount will be amplified after we
introduce the replace support for access. So, add a preparatory change
of a constitutive helper iommufd_access_change_ioas(), to take care of
the existing iommufd_access_attach() and iommufd_access_detach().

Also, update the unprotect routine in iommufd_access_destroy_object()
to calling the new iommufd_access_change_ioas() helper.

Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
index 7a3e8660b902..d9680a247e1c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
@@ -684,17 +684,69 @@ void iommufd_device_detach(struct iommufd_device *idev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_device_detach, IOMMUFD);
 
+static int iommufd_access_change_ioas(struct iommufd_access *access,
+				      struct iommufd_ioas *new_ioas)
+{
+	u32 iopt_access_list_id = access->iopt_access_list_id;
+	struct iommufd_ioas *cur_ioas = access->ioas;
+	int rc;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&access->ioas_lock);
+
+	/* We are racing with a concurrent detach, bail */
+	if (cur_ioas != access->ioas_unpin)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(new_ioas))
+		return PTR_ERR(new_ioas);
+
+	if (cur_ioas == new_ioas) {
+		/* Do not forget to put since we allow a duplication */
+		iommufd_put_object(&new_ioas->obj);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Set ioas to NULL to block any further iommufd_access_pin_pages().
+	 * iommufd_access_unpin_pages() can continue using access->ioas_unpin.
+	 */
+	access->ioas = NULL;
+
+	if (new_ioas) {
+		rc = iopt_add_access(&new_ioas->iopt, access);
+		if (rc) {
+			iommufd_put_object(&new_ioas->obj);
+			access->ioas = cur_ioas;
+			return rc;
+		}
+		iommufd_ref_to_users(&new_ioas->obj);
+	}
+
+	if (cur_ioas) {
+		if (access->ops->unmap) {
+			mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
+			access->ops->unmap(access->data, 0, ULONG_MAX);
+			mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		}
+		iopt_remove_access(&cur_ioas->iopt, access, iopt_access_list_id);
+		refcount_dec(&cur_ioas->obj.users);
+	}
+
+	access->ioas = new_ioas;
+	access->ioas_unpin = new_ioas;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void iommufd_access_destroy_object(struct iommufd_object *obj)
 {
 	struct iommufd_access *access =
 		container_of(obj, struct iommufd_access, obj);
 
-	if (access->ioas) {
-		iopt_remove_access(&access->ioas->iopt, access,
-				   access->iopt_access_list_id);
-		refcount_dec(&access->ioas->obj.users);
-		access->ioas = NULL;
-	}
+	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	if (access->ioas)
+		WARN_ON(iommufd_access_change_ioas(access, NULL));
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 	iommufd_ctx_put(access->ictx);
 }
 
@@ -761,60 +813,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_destroy, IOMMUFD);
 
 void iommufd_access_detach(struct iommufd_access *access)
 {
-	struct iommufd_ioas *cur_ioas = access->ioas;
+	int rc;
 
 	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
-	if (WARN_ON(!access->ioas))
-		goto out;
-	/*
-	 * Set ioas to NULL to block any further iommufd_access_pin_pages().
-	 * iommufd_access_unpin_pages() can continue using access->ioas_unpin.
-	 */
-	access->ioas = NULL;
-
-	if (access->ops->unmap) {
+	if (WARN_ON(!access->ioas)) {
 		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-		access->ops->unmap(access->data, 0, ULONG_MAX);
-		mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		return;
 	}
-	iopt_remove_access(&cur_ioas->iopt, access,
-			   access->iopt_access_list_id);
-	refcount_dec(&cur_ioas->obj.users);
-out:
-	access->ioas_unpin = NULL;
+	rc = iommufd_access_change_ioas(access, NULL);
+	WARN_ON(rc);
 	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_detach, IOMMUFD);
 
 int iommufd_access_attach(struct iommufd_access *access, u32 ioas_id)
 {
-	struct iommufd_ioas *new_ioas;
-	int rc = 0;
+	struct iommufd_ctx *ictx = access->ictx;
+	int rc;
 
 	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
-	if (WARN_ON(access->ioas || access->ioas_unpin)) {
+	if (WARN_ON(access->ioas)) {
 		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	new_ioas = iommufd_get_ioas(access->ictx, ioas_id);
-	if (IS_ERR(new_ioas)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-		return PTR_ERR(new_ioas);
-	}
-
-	rc = iopt_add_access(&new_ioas->iopt, access);
-	if (rc) {
-		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-		iommufd_put_object(&new_ioas->obj);
-		return rc;
-	}
-	iommufd_ref_to_users(&new_ioas->obj);
-
-	access->ioas = new_ioas;
-	access->ioas_unpin = new_ioas;
+	rc = iommufd_access_change_ioas(access,
+					iommufd_get_ioas(ictx, ioas_id));
 	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
-	return 0;
+	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_attach, IOMMUFD);
 
-- 
2.41.0