| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5CO4TS6wMsnaL7ob4CXogj5KT52x85YUUN1ZwDkOxW0oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:43:27 +0900
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Cc: Hsia-Jun Li <randy.li@...aptics.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
ayaka@...lik.info, hans.verkuil@...co.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, hiroh@...omium.org,
hverkuil@...all.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: v4l2-mem2mem: add a list for buf used by hw
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:07 PM Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca> wrote:
>
> Le mercredi 12 juillet 2023 à 09:33 +0000, Tomasz Figa a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 12:00:38PM +0800, Hsia-Jun Li wrote:
> > > From: "Hsia-Jun(Randy) Li" <randy.li@...aptics.com>
> > >
> > > Many drivers have to create its own buf_struct for a
> > > vb2_queue to track such a state. Also driver has to
> > > iterate over rdy_queue every times to find out a buffer
> > > which is not sent to hardware(or firmware), this new
> > > list just offers the driver a place to store the buffer
> > > that hardware(firmware) has acknowledged.
> > >
> > > One important advance about this list, it doesn't like
> > > rdy_queue which both bottom half of the user calling
> > > could operate it, while the v4l2 worker would as well.
> > > The v4l2 core could only operate this queue when its
> > > v4l2_context is not running, the driver would only
> > > access this new hw_queue in its own worker.
> >
> > Could you describe in what case such a list would be useful for a
> > mem2mem driver?
>
> Today all driver must track buffers that are "owned by the hardware". This is a
> concept dictated by the m2m framework and enforced through the ACTIVE flag. All
> buffers from this list must be mark as done/error/queued after streamoff of the
> respective queue in order to acknowledge that they are no longer in use by the
> HW. Not doing so will warn:
>
> videobuf2_common: driver bug: stop_streaming operation is leaving buf ...
>
> Though, there is no queue to easily iterate them. All driver endup having their
> own queue, or just leaving the buffers in the rdy_queue (which isn't better).
>
Thanks for the explanation. I see how it could be useful now.
Although I guess this is a problem specifically for hardware (or
firmware) which can internally queue more than 1 buffer, right?
Otherwise the current buffer could just stay at the top of the
rdy_queue until it's removed by the driver's completion handler,
timeout/error handler or context destruction.
Best regards,
Tomasz
> Nicolas
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hsia-Jun(Randy) Li <randy.li@...aptics.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> > > include/media/v4l2-mem2mem.h | 10 +++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > > index c771aba42015..b4151147d5bd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > > @@ -321,15 +321,21 @@ static void __v4l2_m2m_try_queue(struct v4l2_m2m_dev *m2m_dev,
> > > goto job_unlock;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - src = v4l2_m2m_next_src_buf(m2m_ctx);
> > > - dst = v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf(m2m_ctx);
> > > - if (!src && !m2m_ctx->out_q_ctx.buffered) {
> > > - dprintk("No input buffers available\n");
> > > - goto job_unlock;
> > > + if (list_empty(&m2m_ctx->out_q_ctx.hw_queue)) {
> > > + src = v4l2_m2m_next_src_buf(m2m_ctx);
> > > +
> > > + if (!src && !m2m_ctx->out_q_ctx.buffered) {
> > > + dprintk("No input buffers available\n");
> > > + goto job_unlock;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > - if (!dst && !m2m_ctx->cap_q_ctx.buffered) {
> > > - dprintk("No output buffers available\n");
> > > - goto job_unlock;
> > > +
> > > + if (list_empty(&m2m_ctx->cap_q_ctx.hw_queue)) {
> > > + dst = v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf(m2m_ctx);
> > > + if (!dst && !m2m_ctx->cap_q_ctx.buffered) {
> > > + dprintk("No output buffers available\n");
> > > + goto job_unlock;
> > > + }
> > > }
> >
> > src and dst would be referenced unitialized below if neither of the
> > above ifs hits...
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz
> >
> > >
> > > m2m_ctx->new_frame = true;
> > > @@ -896,6 +902,7 @@ int v4l2_m2m_streamoff(struct file *file, struct v4l2_m2m_ctx *m2m_ctx,
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q_ctx->rdy_queue);
> > > q_ctx->num_rdy = 0;
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q_ctx->rdy_spinlock, flags);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q_ctx->hw_queue);
> > >
> > > if (m2m_dev->curr_ctx == m2m_ctx) {
> > > m2m_dev->curr_ctx = NULL;
> > > @@ -1234,6 +1241,8 @@ struct v4l2_m2m_ctx *v4l2_m2m_ctx_init(struct v4l2_m2m_dev *m2m_dev,
> > >
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&out_q_ctx->rdy_queue);
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cap_q_ctx->rdy_queue);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&out_q_ctx->hw_queue);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cap_q_ctx->hw_queue);
> > > spin_lock_init(&out_q_ctx->rdy_spinlock);
> > > spin_lock_init(&cap_q_ctx->rdy_spinlock);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-mem2mem.h b/include/media/v4l2-mem2mem.h
> > > index d6c8eb2b5201..2342656e582d 100644
> > > --- a/include/media/v4l2-mem2mem.h
> > > +++ b/include/media/v4l2-mem2mem.h
> > > @@ -53,9 +53,16 @@ struct v4l2_m2m_dev;
> > > * processed
> > > *
> > > * @q: pointer to struct &vb2_queue
> > > - * @rdy_queue: List of V4L2 mem-to-mem queues
> > > + * @rdy_queue: List of V4L2 mem-to-mem queues. If v4l2_m2m_buf_queue() is
> > > + * called in struct vb2_ops->buf_queue(), the buffer enqueued
> > > + * by user would be added to this list.
> > > * @rdy_spinlock: spin lock to protect the struct usage
> > > * @num_rdy: number of buffers ready to be processed
> > > + * @hw_queue: A list for tracking the buffer is occupied by the hardware
> > > + * (or device's firmware). A buffer could only be in either
> > > + * this list or @rdy_queue.
> > > + * Driver may choose not to use this list while uses its own
> > > + * private data to do this work.
> > > * @buffered: is the queue buffered?
> > > *
> > > * Queue for buffers ready to be processed as soon as this
> > > @@ -68,6 +75,7 @@ struct v4l2_m2m_queue_ctx {
> > > struct list_head rdy_queue;
> > > spinlock_t rdy_spinlock;
> > > u8 num_rdy;
> > > + struct list_head hw_queue;
> > > bool buffered;
> > > };
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists