[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276E70BEC76AB3D96CCF5028C01A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:14:45 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 4/4] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for
IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO ioctl
> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 7:00 PM
>
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
> #include "io_pagetable.h"
> #include "iommufd_private.h"
> +#include "iommufd_test.h"
Is it stale?
> @@ -211,7 +213,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(iommufd_ioas)
>
> for (i = 0; i != variant->mock_domains; i++) {
> test_cmd_mock_domain(self->ioas_id, &self->stdev_id,
> - &self->hwpt_id, NULL);
> + &self->hwpt_id, &self->device_id);
> self->base_iova = MOCK_APERTURE_START;
> }
> }
> @@ -290,6 +292,19 @@ TEST_F(iommufd_ioas, ioas_area_auto_destroy)
> }
> }
>
> +TEST_F(iommufd_ioas, get_hw_info)
> +{
> + struct iommu_test_hw_info info;
> +
> + if (self->device_id) {
> + test_cmd_get_hw_info(self->device_id, sizeof(info), &info);
> + assert(info.test_reg ==
> IOMMU_HW_INFO_SELFTEST_REGVAL);
> + } else {
> + test_err_get_hw_info(ENOENT, self->device_id,
> + sizeof(info), &info);
> + }
If self->device_id is invalid it should be reported right after
test_cmd_mock_domain()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists