[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230727092209.GA8175@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:22:09 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 22/28] mfd: core: Ensure disabled devices are skiped
without aborting
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023, Herve Codina wrote:
> The loop searching for a matching device based on its compatible
> string is aborted when a matching disabled device is found.
> This abort avoid to add devices as soon as one disabled device
> is found.
>
> Continue searching for an other device instead of aborting on the
> first disabled one fixes the issue.
>
> Fixes: 22380b65dc70 ("mfd: mfd-core: Ensure disabled devices are ignored without error")
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> index 0ed7c0d7784e..bcc26e64639a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct device_node *np = NULL;
> struct mfd_of_node_entry *of_entry, *tmp;
> + bool disabled;
> int ret = -ENOMEM;
> int platform_id;
> int r;
> @@ -181,13 +182,13 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
> goto fail_res;
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && parent->of_node && cell->of_compatible) {
> + disabled = false;
This does not appear to reside in a loop.
Why not set it to false on declaration?
> for_each_child_of_node(parent->of_node, np) {
> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, cell->of_compatible)) {
> - /* Ignore 'disabled' devices error free */
> + /* Skip 'disabled' devices */
> if (!of_device_is_available(np)) {
> - of_node_put(np);
Doesn't this result in a resource leak?
> - ret = 0;
> - goto fail_alias;
> + disabled = true;
> + continue;
> }
>
> ret = mfd_match_of_node_to_dev(pdev, np, cell);
> @@ -197,10 +198,17 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
> if (ret)
> goto fail_alias;
>
> - break;
> + goto match;
> }
> }
>
> + if (disabled) {
> + /* Ignore 'disabled' devices error free */
> + ret = 0;
> + goto fail_alias;
> + }
> +
> +match:
> if (!pdev->dev.of_node)
> pr_warn("%s: Failed to locate of_node [id: %d]\n",
> cell->name, platform_id);
> --
> 2.41.0
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists