[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v8e5r6s6.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 11:24:41 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@...aro.org>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 03:22:40 +0100,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> From: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
>
> Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() and the associated macro
> __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLB to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() and
> __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS respectively.
>
> Making the name plural matches kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() and makes it more
> clear that this function can affect more than one remote TLB.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
> arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 04cedf9f8811..9b0ad8f3bf32 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>
> -#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLB
> -int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(struct kvm *kvm);
> +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS
> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
How about making this prototype global? I don't see a point in having
it per-architecture, specially as you are adding arm64 to that mix in
the following patch.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists