[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230727105530.GA1854855@e124191.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 11:55:30 +0100
From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: vdso: remove two .altinstructions related symbols
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:19:27AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 01:36:19AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > The two symbols __alt_instructions and __alt_instructions_end are not
> > used, remove them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > index 6028f1fe2d1c..45354f2ddf70 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > @@ -50,9 +50,7 @@ SECTIONS
> >
> > . = ALIGN(4);
> > .altinstructions : {
> > - __alt_instructions = .;
> > *(.altinstructions)
> > - __alt_instructions_end = .;
> > }
>
> If we don't need the symbols, then why do we need this section at all?
Looks like it was a copy/paste from my commit 4e3bca8f7cdd ("arm64: alternative: patch alternatives in the vDSO").
The VDSO patching code searches for a section named '.altinstructions' by
reading the VDSO as an ELF file, and doesn't use the __alt_instructions /
__alt_instructions_end symbols. The kernel patching code uses the
__alt_instructions symbol (from the vmlinux.ld.S linker script).
So it's safe to remove these, but the section itself needs to stay.
Thanks,
Joey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists