[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMJOl5uLrK9rucXB@krava>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:01:43 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@....windriver.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix warnings "'pad_type' 'pad_bits' 'new_off'
may be used uninitialized"
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:25:36PM +0800, Xiangyu Chen wrote:
> From: Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@...driver.com>
>
> When turn on the yocto DEBUG_BUILD flag, the build options for gcc would enable maybe-uninitialized,
> and following warnings would be reported as below:
curious, what's the gcc version? I can't reproduce that,
and we already have all warnings enabled:
CFLAGS += -Werror -Wall
they seem like false warnings also, because ARRAY_SIZE(pads)
will be always > 0
jirka
>
> | btf_dump.c: In function 'btf_dump_emit_bit_padding':
> | btf_dump.c:916:4: error: 'pad_type' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> | 916 | btf_dump_printf(d, "\n%s%s: %d;", pfx(lvl), pad_type,
> | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | 917 | in_bitfield ? new_off - cur_off : 0);
> | | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | btf_dump.c:929:6: error: 'pad_bits' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> | 929 | if (bits == pad_bits) {
> | | ^
> | btf_dump.c:913:28: error: 'new_off' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> | 913 | (new_off == next_off && roundup(cur_off, next_align * 8) != new_off) ||
> | | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiangyu Chen <xiangyu.chen@...driver.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
> index 4d9f30bf7f01..79923c3b8777 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c
> @@ -867,8 +867,8 @@ static void btf_dump_emit_bit_padding(const struct btf_dump *d,
> } pads[] = {
> {"long", d->ptr_sz * 8}, {"int", 32}, {"short", 16}, {"char", 8}
> };
> - int new_off, pad_bits, bits, i;
> - const char *pad_type;
> + int new_off = 0, pad_bits = 0, bits, i;
> + const char *pad_type = NULL;
>
> if (cur_off >= next_off)
> return; /* no gap */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists