[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5660c1a5-21ce-ad0a-2488-c3429ea7e995@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:07:23 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers:iio:admv1013: add vcc regulators
On 27/07/2023 13:01, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> Add regulators for the VCC supplies of the admv1013.
>
> The patch aims to align the implementation with the current admv1014
...
> const char *str;
> struct spi_device *spi = st->spi;
>
> @@ -554,6 +567,17 @@ static int admv1013_properties_parse(struct admv1013_state *st)
> return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, PTR_ERR(st->reg),
> "failed to get the common-mode voltage\n");
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ADMV1013_VCC_NUM_REGULATORS; ++i)
> + st->vcc_regs[i].supply = admv1013_reg_name[i];
> +
> + ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(&st->spi->dev,
> + ADMV1013_VCC_NUM_REGULATORS,
> + st->vcc_regs);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to request VCC regulators");
> + return ret;
This should be return dev_err_probe, unless this is not called from
probe path.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists