linux-kernel - Re: [v3] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL for efficient page table scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:31:18 +0500
From:   Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To:     Michał Mirosław <emmir@...gle.com>
Cc:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Danylo Mocherniuk <mdanylo@...gle.com>,
        Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [v3] fs/proc/task_mmu: Implement IOCTL for efficient page table
 scanning

On 7/27/23 4:26 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 10:03, Muhammad Usama Anjum
> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>> On 7/27/23 2:10 AM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 10:34, Muhammad Usama Anjum
>>> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7/25/23 11:05 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 11:11, Muhammad Usama Anjum
>>>>> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> 2. For the address tagging part I'd prefer someone who knows how this
>>>>> is used take a look. We're ignoring the tag (but clear it on return in
>>>>> ->start) - so it doesn't matter for the ioctl() itself.
>>>> I've added Kirill if he can give his thoughts about tagged memory.
>>>>
>>>> Right now we are removing the tags from all 3 pointers (start, end, vec)
>>>> before using the pointers on kernel side. But we are overwriting and
>>>> writing the walk ending address in start which user can read/use.
>>>>
>>>> I think we shouldn't over-write the start (and its tag) and instead return
>>>> the ending walk address in new variable, walk_end.
>>>
>>> The overwrite of `start` is making the ioctl restart (continuation)
>>> easier to handle. I prefer the current way, but it's not a strong
>>> opinion.
>> We shouldn't overwrite the start if we aren't gonna put the correct tag. So
>> I've resorted to adding another variable `walk_end` to return the walk
>> ending address.
> 
> Yes. We have two options:
> 
> 1. add new field and have the userspace check it and update start
> itself to continue the scan,
I've selected this option and sent v26 already:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230727093637.1262110-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com

>  or:
> 2. reconstruct the tag from either orignal `start` or `end` and have
> the userspace re-set `start` if it wants to restart the scan instead
> of continuing.
In some case, compiler can put integrity checking metadata in the pointer's
upper byte. So copying start or end's meta data would be wrong.

> 
> (the second one, using `end`'s tag, might be the easiest for
> userspace, as it can check `start` == `end` when deciding to continue
> or restart).
> 
> Best Regards
> Michał Mirosław

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum