linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230727115934.657787-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:59:34 +0800
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection()

Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from
protection checks") changed the function name but not the corresponding
comment.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index e765d1ff9cbb..3bd00f224224 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
 	/*
 	 * There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim.
 	 * We are special casing this specific case here because
-	 * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep
+	 * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection is not robust enough to keep
 	 * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for
 	 * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
 	 * especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU)
-- 
2.33.0