linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with the spec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 02:45:11 +0000
From:   "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     "sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
        "n.borisov.lkml@...il.com" <n.borisov.lkml@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with
 the spec

On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 18:54 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> 
> On 7/26/23 4:25 AM, Kai Huang wrote:
> > The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG".  Currently, the kernel
> > doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses
> > prefix "TDX_" for all of them.  Although it's arguable whether the TDX
> > spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow
> > the spec when naming those macros.
> > 
> > Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec.  As
> > a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs,
> > which all have prefix "TDH".
> > 
> > No functional change intended.
> > 
> 
> When upstreaming the TDX guest patches, there was a discussion about using
> TDG vs TDX. Final agreement is to use TDX_ prefix. I think it makes sense
> to align with the spec, but it is up to the maintainer.
> 
> What about the function name prefix? Are you planning to change them to tdg_*?

I changed to __tdcall() in the next patch.
 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks.