[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMPdKyOtpZKEMLsO@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:22:19 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Wong Vee Khee <veekhee@...le.com>,
Revanth Kumar Uppala <ruppala@...dia.com>,
Jochen Henneberg <jh@...neberg-systemdesign.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/2] net: stmmac: dwmac-imx: pause the TXC clock
in fixed-link
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 01:36:45PM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
> > index 53ee5a42c071..e7819960128e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c
> > @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
> > #define DMA_BUS_MODE 0x00001000
> > #define DMA_BUS_MODE_SFT_RESET (0x1 << 0)
> > #define RMII_RESET_SPEED (0x3 << 14)
> > +#define MII_RESET_SPEED (0x2 << 14)
> > +#define RGMII_RESET_SPEED (0x0 << 14)
> > +#define CTRL_SPEED_MASK (0x3 << 14)
>
> GENMASK() would be cleaner, as well as BIT() usage, but I do see
> the driver currently does shifts.. so /me shrugs
BIT() is only useful for single-bit items, not for use with bitfields,
and their use with bitfields just makes the whole thing perverse.
#define CTRL_SPEED_MASK GENMASK(15, 14)
#define CTRL_SPEED_RGMII_RESET 0
#define CTRL_SPEED_MII_RESET 2
#define CTRL_SPEED_RMII_RESET 3
and then its use:
FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SPEED_MASK, CTRL_SPEED_RGMII_RESET)
or
FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SPEED_MASK, CTRL_SPEED_MII_RESET)
or
FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SPEED_MASK, CTRL_SPEED_RMII_RESET)
alternatively:
if (iface == MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_RMII)
speed = CTRL_SPEED_RMII_RESET;
else (iface == MX93_GPR_ENET_QOS_INTF_SEL_MII)
speed = CTRL_SPEED_MII_RESET;
else
speed = CTRL_SPEED_RGMII_RESET;
old_ctrl = readl(dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
ctrl = old_ctrl & ~CTRL_SPEED_MASK;
ctrl |= FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SPEED_MASK, speed);
writel(ctrl, dwmac->base_addr + MAC_CTRL_REG);
> I don't have any documentation for the registers here, and as you can
> see I'm an amateur with respect to memory ordering based on my prior
> comment.
>
> But you:
>
> 1. Read intf_reg_off into variable iface
> 2. Write the RESET_SPEED for the appropriate mode to MAC_CTRL_REG
> 3. wmb() to ensure that write goes through
I wonder about whether that wmb() is required. If the mapping is
device-like rather than memory-like, the write should be committed
before the read that regmap_update_bits() does according to the ARM
memory model. Maybe a bit of information about where this barrier
has come from would be good, and maybe getting it reviewed by the
arm64 barrier specialist, Will Deacon. :)
wmb() is normally required to be paired with a rmb(), but we're not
talking about system memory here, so I also wonder whether wmb() is
the correct barrier to use.
Adding Will.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists