[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1e720a1-d52c-a14b-3389-a2fb830c208e@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 21:45:04 +0530
From: Ayush Jain <ayush.jain3@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
zhansayabagdaulet@...il.com, tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com,
raghavendra.kodsarathimmappa@....com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Narasimhan.V@....com,
Santosh.Shukla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: mm: ksm: Fix incorrect evaluation of
parameter
Hello David,
On 7/28/2023 8:05 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 28.07.23 08:01, Ayush Jain wrote:
>> A missing break in kms_tests leads to kselftest hang when the
>> parameter -s is used.
>> In current code flow because of missing break in -s, -t parses
>> args spilled from -s and as -t accepts only valid values as 0,1
>> so any arg in -s >1 or <0, gets in ksm_test failure
>>
>> This went undetected since, before the addition of option -t,
>> the next case -M would immediately break out of the switch
>> statement but that is no longer the case
>>
>> Add the missing break statement.
>>
>> ----Before----
>> ./ksm_tests -H -s 100
>> Invalid merge type
>>
>> ----After----
>> ./ksm_tests -H -s 100
>> Number of normal pages: 0
>> Number of huge pages: 50
>> Total size: 100 MiB
>> Total time: 0.401732682 s
>> Average speed: 248.922 MiB/s
>>
>> Fixes: 9e7cb94ca218 ("selftests: vm: add KSM merging time test")
>
> I think this actually fixes 07115fcc15b4 ("selftests/mm: add new selftests for KSM") that added the "t" parsing.
>
Sure will update in v2.
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
Thanks,
Ayush Jain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists