[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169056211617.208880.10400351966983316793.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:35:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_micfil: refactor deprecated strncpy
On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 22:26:41 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].
>
> A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it
> guarantees NUL-termination on its destination buffer argument which is
> _not_ always the case for `strncpy`!
>
> In this case, though, there was great care taken to ensure that the
> destination buffer would be NUL-terminated through the use of `len - 1`
> ensuring that the previously zero-initialized buffer would not overwrite
> the last NUL byte. This means that there's no bug here.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: fsl_micfil: refactor deprecated strncpy
commit: 7eb10bfbbae6025cb7b4bba3db0c1281eac05862
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists