linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 10/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230728164254.27562-11-james.morse@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:42:40 +0000
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
        D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
        carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
        bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
        xingxin.hx@...nanolis.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
        Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
        dfustini@...libre.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/24] tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef

tick_nohz_full_mask lists the CPUs that are nohz_full. This is only
needed when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined. tick_nohz_full_cpu() allows
a specific CPU to be tested against the mask, and evaluates to false
when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not defined.

The resctrl code needs to pick a CPU to run some work on, a new helper
prefers housekeeping CPUs by examining the tick_nohz_full_mask. Hiding
the declaration behind #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL forces all the users to
be behind an ifdef too.

Move the tick_nohz_full_mask declaration, this lets callers drop the
ifdef, and guard access to tick_nohz_full_mask with IS_ENABLED() or
something like tick_nohz_full_cpu().

The definition does not need to be moved as any callers should be
removed at compile time unless CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
---
 include/linux/tick.h | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index 9459fef5b857..65af90ca409a 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -174,9 +174,16 @@ static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
 static inline void tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick_protected(void) { }
 #endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
 
+/*
+ * Mask of CPUs that are nohz_full.
+ *
+ * Users should be guarded by CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL or a tick_nohz_full_cpu()
+ * check.
+ */
+extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
 extern bool tick_nohz_full_running;
-extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
 
 static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void)
 {
-- 
2.39.2