[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5844361F-E776-4C52-BA8F-7E13D6B4EDE1@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 16:46:27 +0000
From: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: selftests: connector: proc_filter.c:48:20: error: invalid
application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct proc_input'
> On Jul 27, 2023, at 7:43 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:38:40 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>> Jakub,
>> Do I need to revert the -f runtime filter option back to compile time
>> and commit with that disabled so the selftest compiles on a kernel on
>> which the new options are not defined?
>
> I'm not 100% sure myself on what's the expectations for building
> selftests against uAPI headers is..
>
> I _think_ that you're supposed to add an -I$something to
> the CFLAGS in your Makefile. KHDR_INCLUDES maybe? So that the uAPI
> headers from the build get used (rendered by make headers).
>
> Take a look at Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst, I hope
> the answer is somewhere there.
Ok thanks, I will look into your suggestions.
Anjali
Powered by blists - more mailing lists