linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qcom: reset: Use the correct type of sleep/delay based on length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 20:34:06 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qcom: reset: Use the correct type of sleep/delay
 based on length

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:14:52PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Based on the length of the delay (see: [1]), use the correct sleep/delay
> functions.

I believe this comment was good in v1, but there's no mentioning of
fsleep() in the referenced document. Now I have read the code and know
better, real nice.

Could you please improve the commit message to make obvious what I had
to look at the code to understand, and to by-pass-educate readers of it?

Thanks,
Bjorn