linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v8 2/4] iommufd: Add iommufd_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527691E9B421682C7B88AFD68C06A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:45:39 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "farman@...ux.ibm.com" <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/4] iommufd: Add iommufd_access_replace() API

> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 3:04 AM
> 
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:03:01AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:59:11PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> >
> > > I just realized that either my v8 or your version calls unmap()
> > > first at the entire cur_ioas. So, there seems to be no point in
> > > doing that fallback re-add routine since the cur_ioas isn't the
> > > same, which I don't feel quite right...
> >
> > The point is to restore the access back to how it should be on failure
> > so future use of the accesss still does the right thing.
> >
> > We already have built into this a certain non-atomicity for mdevs,
> > they can see a pin failure during replace if they race an access
> > during this unmap window. This is similar to the real HW iommu's
> > without atomic replace.
> 
> I was concerned about, after the replace, mdev losing all the
> mappings due to the unmap() call, which means the fallback is
> not really a status quo. Do you mean that they could pin those
> lost mappings back?

None of mdev drivers does that.

but we need think about the actual usage. I don't think the user
can request ioas change w/o actually reconfiguring the mdev
device. Presumably the latter could lead to reconstructure of pinned
pages.

so in code-level as Jason said we just need ensure the access is
back to an usable state.