[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hh6pnhn45.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:06:34 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Huqiang Qin <huqiang.qin@...ogic.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, jbrunet@...libre.com,
martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: Replace the IRQ number with the IRQID
macro definition
Huqiang Qin <huqiang.qin@...ogic.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin Hilman,
>
> On 2023/7/27 6:33, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> Replacing IRQ numbers with IRQID macro definitions makes node properties
>>> easier to understand and also makes GPIO interrupts easier to use.
>>>
>>> Associated platforms:
>>> - Amlogic Meson-G12A
>>> - Amlogic Meson-G12B
>>> - Amlogic Meson-SM1
>> Does this mean you tested/validated these changes on those platforms
>> also?
>
> Amlogic's G12A/G12B/SM1 have the same GPIO, and the GPIO interrupt number
> is also the same, so I only tested on the SM1 platform, and the test results
> prove that these changes are good.
OK, thank you for the explanation.
For future reference, this kind of detail is helpful to describe in the
patch or cover letter so maintainers & reviewers better understand how
the changes were tested.
Thanks,
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists