linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] keys: Introduce a keys frontend for attestation reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64c41aa5ba9ac_a88b29494@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:44:37 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "Dionna Amalie Glaze" <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] keys: Introduce a keys frontend for attestation
 reports

Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri Jul 28, 2023 at 7:30 PM UTC, Dan Williams wrote:
> > The bulk of the justification for this patch kit is in "[PATCH 1/4]
> 
> /patch kit/patch set/
> 
> > keys: Introduce tsm keys". The short summary is that the current
> > approach of adding new char devs and new ioctls, for what amounts to the
> > same functionality with minor formatting differences across vendors, is
> > untenable. Common concepts and the community benefit from common
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > Use Keys to build common infrastructure for confidential computing
> 
> /Keys/Linux keyring/
> 
> > attestation report blobs, convert sevguest to use it (leaving the
> > deprecation question alone for now), and pave the way for tdx-guest and
> > the eventual risc-v equivalent to use it in lieu of new ioctls.
> >
> > The sevguest conversion is only compile-tested.
> >
> > This submission is To:David since he needs to sign-off on the idea of a
> > new Keys type, the rest is up to the confidential-computing driver
> > maintainers to adopt.
> >
> > Changes from / credit for internal review:
> > - highlight copy_{to,from}_sockptr() as a common way to mix
> >   copy_user() and memcpy() paths (Andy)
> > - add MODULE_DESCRIPTION() (Andy)
> > - clarify how the user-defined portion blob might be used (Elena)
> > - clarify the key instantiation options (Sathya)
> > - drop usage of a list for registering providers (Sathya)
> > - drop list.h include from tsm.h (Andy)
> > - add a comment for how TSM_DATA_MAX was derived (Andy)
> > - stop open coding kmemdup_nul() (Andy)
> > - add types.h to tsm.h (Andy)
> > - fix punctuation in comment (Andy)
> > - reorder security/keys/Makefile (Andy)
> > - add some missing includes to tsm.c (Andy)
> > - undo an 81 column clang-format line break (Andy)
> > - manually reflow tsm_token indentation (Andy)
> > - move allocations after input validation in tsm_instantiate() (Andy)
> > - switch to bin2hex() in tsm_read() (Andy)
> > - move init/exit declarations next to their functions (Andy)
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Dan Williams (4):
> >       keys: Introduce tsm keys
> >       virt: sevguest: Prep for kernel internal {get,get_ext}_report()
> >       mm/slab: Add __free() support for kvfree
> >       virt: sevguest: Add TSM key support for SNP_{GET,GET_EXT}_REPORT
> >
> >
> >  drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/Kconfig     |    2 
> >  drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c |  135 ++++++++++++++-
> >  include/keys/tsm.h                      |   71 ++++++++
> >  include/linux/slab.h                    |    2 
> >  security/keys/Kconfig                   |   12 +
> >  security/keys/Makefile                  |    1 
> >  security/keys/tsm.c                     |  282 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  7 files changed, 494 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 include/keys/tsm.h
> >  create mode 100644 security/keys/tsm.c
> >
> > base-commit: 06c2afb862f9da8dc5efa4b6076a0e48c3fbaaa5
> 
> So how does this scale? Does it scale to TDX, SGX, TPM's or even TEE's
> (ARM SM, RISC-V Keystone etc.). I'm not sure about the scope but we want
> of course something that adapts to multiple use cases, right?

TPMs and TEEs are covered by trusted-keys. I do think a "TSM" flavor of
trusted-keys is in scope for where some of these implementations are
headed, but that comes later. I talk about that in the changelog that
functionality like SNP_GET_DERIVED_KEY likely wants to have a
trusted-keys frontend and not isolated behind a vendor-specific ioctl
interface.

This facility is different, it is just aiming to unify this attestation
report flow. It scales to any driver that can provide the ->auth_new()
operation. I have the sev-guest conversion in this set, and Sathya has
tested this with tdx-guest. I am hoping Samuel can evaluate it for
cove-guest or whatever that driver ends up being called.