linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 02/13] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: support address range type DAMOS filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230728203444.70703-4-sj@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 20:34:34 +0000
From:   SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        damon@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/13] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: support address range type DAMOS filter

Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 19:45:58 +0000
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/13] mm/damon/core-test: add a unit test for
 __damos_filter_out()

Implement a kunit test for the core of address range DAMOS filter
handling, namely __damos_filter_out().  The test especially focus on
regions that overlap with given filter's target address range.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
 mm/damon/core-test.h | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h
index bb07721909e1..44e925bbb094 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h
@@ -341,6 +341,66 @@ static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_set_attrs(c, &invalid_attrs), -EINVAL);
 }
 
+static void damos_test_filter_out(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct damon_target *t;
+	struct damon_region *r, *r2;
+	struct damos_filter *f;
+
+	f = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ADDR, true);
+	f->addr_range = (struct damon_addr_range){
+		.start = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 2, .end = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 6};
+
+	t = damon_new_target();
+	r = damon_new_region(DAMON_MIN_REGION * 3, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 5);
+	damon_add_region(r, t);
+
+	/* region in the range */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, __damos_filter_out(NULL, t, r, f));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1);
+
+	/* region before the range */
+	r->ar.start = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 1;
+	r->ar.end = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 2;
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, __damos_filter_out(NULL, t, r, f));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1);
+
+	/* region after the range */
+	r->ar.start = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 6;
+	r->ar.end = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 8;
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, __damos_filter_out(NULL, t, r, f));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1);
+
+	/* region started before the range */
+	r->ar.start = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 1;
+	r->ar.end = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 4;
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, __damos_filter_out(NULL, t, r, f));
+	/* filter should have split the region */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2);
+	r2 = damon_next_region(r);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r2->ar.start, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r2->ar.end, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 4);
+	damon_destroy_region(r2, t);
+
+	/* region started in the range */
+	r->ar.start = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 2;
+	r->ar.end = DAMON_MIN_REGION * 8;
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, __damos_filter_out(NULL, t, r, f));
+	/* filter should have split the region */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 2);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 6);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2);
+	r2 = damon_next_region(r);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r2->ar.start, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 6);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r2->ar.end, DAMON_MIN_REGION * 8);
+	damon_destroy_region(r2, t);
+
+	damon_free_target(t);
+	damos_free_filter(f);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_target),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_regions),
@@ -353,6 +413,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_regions),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_monitoring_result),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_attrs),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_filter_out),
 	{},
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1